Differentiating Effective and Ineffective Anti-bullying Programs With studies researching anti-bullying programs showing inconsistent results, parents and schools alike should continue to work together to face increasing concerns about school-based bullying. By comparing effective and ineffective programs’ characteristics, anti-bullying advocates can make the first move in subduing a very old problem booming in U.S. schools. What Makes an Ineffective Anti-bullying Program? Schools that treat harassment and continuous teasing as “ordinary” childhood behavior create a climate in which negative peer relationships grow. Ineffective programs give space for individual interpretation on “girls acting like girls” and “boys acting like boys.”
Figuring Out Students
Among the most harmful ambiguities in present anti-bullying practice burdens the victim with the responsibility of advocating for their needs and defending themselves against bullies. By encouraging victims to stand up to bullies, educators, and even parents, are indirectly saying that the victims’ problems are a result of their own social deficiencies. Moreover, this kind of focus may actually endanger the victims.
Finding Ways To Keep Up With Programs
Ineffective bullying prevention programs focus solely on individual bullying incidents. To address the root of bullying, schools should initiate a school culture centered on tolerance and acceptance. Add to that, a lot of bullying incidents will not be seen by school staff. It’s a frightening prospect, but the inability to be omnipresent – being everywhere, seeing everything – controls options for intervening in all bullying incidents. Educators have to be firm and consistent when implementing anti-bullying policies. Unless the whole institution is united against bullying, students will always seek acceptable places where they can harm other students physically and emotionally. What Makes an Effective Anti-bullying Program? Effective anti-bullying programs aim at the whole school environment instead of just particular peer interactions. Such programs not just teach students appropriate communication and positive social leadership techniques, but go to the extent of redesigning school hallways and classrooms in a way that promotes a sense of community and acceptance. A lot of programs are particularly made for school climates that invite bullying and negative behavior. An effective program utilizes strategies and supports at each level in the school — from individual classrooms and students to anti-bullying groups composed of both educators and students. Among the best school-based bully prevention programs are those that use a systemic method, zeroing in on all level components, starting from community to individual, and then classroom to school. In supportive programs, bullies will be isolated. They have zero tolerance for harassment and bullying and pinpoint clear consequences for students who will commit such offenses. One of the most vital, and typically underrepresented, pieces of the anti-bullying puzzle revolves around school and home partnerships. To eliminate bullying, parents and educators should be firm on negative peer interactions, and there should be more communication that includes parents in school’s initiatives against bullying events.